Schließen Alle Abschnitte einklappen
Prozess-Datensatz: Barley grain; ; technology mix; at farm (de) en

Kerninformationen des Datensatzes
Ort AU
Erläuterungen zur geographischen Repräsentativität The dataset represents the cultivation of barley grain for Australia. Cultivation data from Australia is used to represent this region. The geographical representativeness (GeR) of parameters used for the process is considered.
Referenzjahr 2016
Name
Name ; Behandlung, Standards ; Mix und Bereitstellungsort
Barley grain; ; technology mix; at farm
Anwendungshinweis für Datensatz It is intended for use in the feed PEFCR context and other PEF studies where applicable and compliant.
Technisches Anwendungsgebiet Provision of a standard process according to the applied technology.
Klassifizierung
Klassenname : Hierarchieebene
  • ILCD: Materials production / Agricultural production means
Allgemeine Anmerkungen zum Datensatz -
Copyright Ja
Eigentümer des Datensatzes
Quantitative Referenz
Referenzfluss(flüsse)
Zeitliche Repräsentativität
Datensatz gültig bis 2020
Erläuterungen zur zeitlichen Repräsentativität The DQR of the dataset reflects the quality of the data at reference year (2016). The most important time related parameter is the crop yield at agricultural cultivation (based on FAOStat, 2010-2014, for 5-years average data). Remaining parameters are based on country, crop and process specific data.
Technologische Repräsentativität
Technische Beschreibung inklusive der Hintergrundsysteme This process describes the average production of barley grain on a farm in Australia. Cultivation process is based on the Agri-footprint methodology (2017). Considered activities include seeding and seed production, fertilizer and pesticide application rates and production, capital goods depreciation, energy use and transport for field management practices. The elementary flows include field emissions to the air and water, direct land use change, water use and emissions due to pesticide use.;Crop yields were derived mainly from 2010-2014 FAO statistics (FAOStat, FAO, 2016). Fertilizer application rates (in terms of N, P and K requirements) were derived from Pallière (2011), Rosas (2011) and FAOSTAT (2000). Specific fertilizer amounts are calculated based on crop specific nutrient requirements and country specific fertilizer mix derived from International Fertilizer Association (IFA) statistics (IFA, 2015).;Seeding rates are derived from 5-years average FOASTAT data or from the document “Technical Conversion Factors for Agricultural Commodities” document, FAOSTAT (2000). The production process of seeds is identical to this of crop cultivation with the only adjustment of the seed yield at seed production assumed to be 20% less that this of crop yield at farm.;Production of fertilizers and precursors have been modelled based on Kongshaug (1998) and Davis & Haglund (1999). The energy comes from Kongshaug (1998), while additional data on emissions was sourced from Davis and Haglund (1999). Other chemicals and auxiliary materials are modelled based on various data sources.;Animal manure is applied for soil maintenance based on the methodology described in appendix 4 of Vellinga et al. (2013). Heavy metals emissions due to manure and artificial fertilizer application have been calculated based on an adapted methodology from Nemecek & Schnetzer (2012). It is taking into account the heavy metal balance as a function of deposition, use of fertilizer and crop uptake using literature concerning heavy metal contents in manure (Amlinger et. al., 2004) and in fertilizers (Mels, Bisschops, & Swart, 2008).;Energy use was calculated based on data obtained from the farm simulation tool MEBOT (Schreuder, Dijk, Asperen, Boer, & Schoot, 2008).;With reference to the capital goods modelling, based on a literature review of Dutch farming practises we determined that the average material use from depreciation of machinery for arable farming equals 0.37 kg per litre diesel used at a farm. Average mass use of depreciation of machinery was determined using the mass of machinery (Williams, Audsley, & Sandars, 2006), repair factors for various machinery (Frischknecht et al., 2007), economic lifetime and utilisation rates of machinery (Wageningen UR, 2015a). The integration of capital good is analytically explain in the methodology report of the EC feed database (2017).;The pesticide production includes the active ingredient manufacturing (material and energy inputs) based on Green (1987), the inert ingredient production which comprises chemicals available by the ELCD database, the pesticide production which includes the mixing, blending and/or diluting the active ingredients with the inert ingredients and finally the packaging of marketable pesticide product. The integration of pesticide production is analytically explain in the methodology report of the EC feed database (2017). Pesticide application rates were taken from a large volume of literature sources.;Water use has been based on the "blue water" footprint (Mekonnen & Hoekstra, 2010). Land use change has been calculated using "Direct Land Use Change Assessment Tool (2015)" (Blonk Consultants, 2015).;The electricity, fuel production and transport data come from the EC dataset for energy and transport (“GaBi Energy&Transport LCI Datasets for EU Environmental Footprinting (EF) implementation 2016-2020”, of thinkstep AG).;[Dry Matter: 840 g/kg; Moisture: 160 g/kg; Gross Energy: 16.1 MJ/kg; Biogenic carbon of barley grain is 380.08 g/kg.]
Flussdiagram(me) oder Abbildung(en)
  • system diagrams jpeg\System boundary-Crop cultivation-AFP_0.3.jpg Image
LCI-Verfahren und Verteilung
Datensatztyp LCI result
Prinzipielle LCI-Methode Attributional
Abweichungen von LCI-Methode Prinzip / Erklärungen None
LCI-Verfahrens-Ansätze
  • Allocation - market value
Abweichungen von LCI-Verfahrens-Ansätzen / Erklärungen None
Konstanten-Modellierung Direct land use change (LUC): GHG emissions from direct LUC allocated to good/service for 20 years after the LUC occurs. For land use change, all carbon emissions and uptakes are inventoried separately as carbon dioxide from land transformation based on the "Direct Land Use Change Assessment Tool (2015)" (Blonk Consultants, 2015). Land transformation (m2) is also inventoried based on the available FAO statistics up to 2013.;Carbon storage and delayed emissions: credits associated with temporary (carbon) storage or delayed emissions are not considered in the calculation of the EF for the default impact categories.;Emissions off-setting: is not included.;Fossil and biogenic carbon emissions and removals: removals and emissions are modelled as follows:;All GHG emissions from fossil fuels are modelled consistently with the ILCD list of elementary flows. In the case that the emissions refer to the molecules CO2 and CH4, they are modelled as carbon dioxide (fossil) and methane (fossil).;Carbon storage in crops for feed, animals and milk are not included because this carbon is part of the short term carbon cycle and because of this, the carbon dioxide emissions at the end of the life cycle are also not modelled except when the stored carbon is released as methane due to enteric fermentation or manure management and storage, which is inventoried as ‘methane, biogenic’.;Biogenic carbon content of all products is reported in the metadata. This information has been collected based on CVB list (Centraal Veevoeder Bureau, 2011) which lists the chemical composition and nutritional values of feed and within which the carbon content has been calculated based on the Feedprint formula (Vellinga et al., 2013).;Soil carbon accumulation (uptake) via improved agricultural management is excluded from the model.;;
Abweichungen von Konstanten-Modellierung / Erklärungen None
LCA-Methoden-Bericht
Datenquellen, Behandlung und Repräsentativität
Daten-Cut-Off und Vollständigkeit Capital goods (for cultivation and transport) as well as their end-of-life are included.;For the cultivation and processing of crops the following activities are excluded:;-Other consumables (than chemical and organic fertilizer, pesticides, seeds, lime and fertilizer and pesticide packaging) used during cultivation;-Activities related to living at the farm;-Activities related to other business (e.g. producing wind energy);-Raw materials estimated to insignificantly contributing to the environmental impact;-Consumables used at the plant not used as a raw material or auxiliary material;-Packaging if occurring at the processing phase
Abweichungen von Daten-Cut-Off und Vollständigkeit / Erklärungen None
Daten-Auswahl und Kombinations-Prinzipien All relevant background data such as energy and auxiliary material are taken from the EF energy and transport dataset and Agri-footprint 3.0 and ELCD databases.
Abweichungen von Daten-Auswahl und Kombinations-Prinzipien / Erklärungen None
Daten-Behandlung und Interpolations-Prinzipien Several data sources have been combined. Country specific data have been modelled based on best available data sources. For regional data market shares have been formulated based on 5-years average production data and coverage has been extrapolated to 100% based on the countries with highest shares.
Abweichungen von Daten-Behandlung und Interpolations-Prinzipien / Erklärungen None
Grundsätze der Datenbehandlung
Für diesen Datensatz verwendete Datenquelle(n)
Abgedeckte prozentuale Lieferung oder Produktion 100 %
Unsicherheits-Anpassungen None
Vollständigkeit
Vollständigkeit des Produktmodells All relevant flows quantified
Unterstützte Folgenabschätzungs-Methoden
  • ILCD v 1.0.10
Vollständigkeit Elementarflüsse, pro Thema
  • Noise: No statement
Validierung
Art der Prüfung Datenqualitätsindikatoren Prüfungsdetails
Independent external review
  • Overall quality: Good - 1.88
  • Precision: Good - 2.39
  • Geographical representativeness: Good - 1.82
  • Time representativeness: Good - 1.84
  • Technological representativeness: Very good - 1.48
The dataset is compliant with the methodology report v1.0 of April 2017, which involves compliancy with the tender specification for the provision of "feed" process-based product environmental footprint-compliant life cycle inventory datasets (contract number No ENV.A.1/SER/2016/0035VL) and the draft Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules guidance document v6.1. This implicitly means compliance with "ILCD Data Network - Entry-level requirements". The review has been performed on the complete disaggregated datasets by 3 of the 4 reviewers, testing on compliance with the methodology requirements as set in the methodology report. In the first review round also the methodological starting points were discussed. As a consequence the definition of data quality of Time and Technological representativeness of supplying processes has been adapted as approved. The metadata compliance and ILCD compliance will be tested after placing the data on the node. The representativeness of the data regarding geography, technology and time is very good to fair, as recent data for the specific country/region as well as the employed technologies was in most cases available for the relevant parts of the value chain of the dataset. The precision of the data is good to fair, given some uncertainties of measured and reported data. As a result, all data provided reaches an overall data quality score no larger than 3.0. The results are plausible, both for the impact category level results as well as for the most relevant elementary flows. The data set documentation is reflecting what has been modelled and is appropriate in terms of content and level of detail. The system boundaries include all relevant processes and activity types from cradle to gate as being defined in the methodology report. It is very likely that the not covered activities and flows (cut-off due to data limitations for less relevant contributors) jointly contribute less than a few % to the overall environmental impacts. So the applied cut off rules respect the 95% treshold as meant in the tender specifications.
Nachträgliche Bewertungs-Kommentare
Full review reports in: \external_docs
Name von Prüfer und Prüfinstitution Vollständiger Prüfbericht
Art der Prüfung Zweck und Methode(n) der Bewertung Datenqualitätsindikatoren
Independent internal review
Name des Zwecks Name der Methode
Unit process(es), black box
  • Cross-check with other data set
  • Cross-check with other source
  • Validation of data sources
  • Expert judgement
  • Sample tests on calculations
  • Mass balance
  • Energy balance
  • Documentation
Documentation
  • Expert judgement
Goal and scope definition
  • Expert judgement
Unit process(es), single operation
  • Cross-check with other data set
  • Cross-check with other source
  • Validation of data sources
  • Expert judgement
  • Sample tests on calculations
  • Mass balance
  • Energy balance
  • Documentation
LCIA results
  • Cross-check with other data set
  • Cross-check with other source
  • Expert judgement
LCI results or Partly terminated system
  • Cross-check with other data set
  • Cross-check with other source
  • Validation of data sources
  • Expert judgement
  • Sample tests on calculations
  • Mass balance
  • Energy balance
  • Documentation
LCIA results calculation
  • Cross-check with other data set
  • Cross-check with other source
  • Expert judgement
Raw data
  • Cross-check with other data set
  • Cross-check with other source
  • Validation of data sources
  • Expert judgement
  • Sample tests on calculations
  • Mass balance
  • Energy balance
  • Documentation
Life cycle inventory methods
  • Mass balance
  • Element balance
  • Expert judgement
  • Energy balance
  • Overall quality: Good - 1.88
  • Precision: Good - 2.39
  • Geographical representativeness: Good - 1.82
  • Time representativeness: Good - 1.84
  • Technological representativeness: Very good - 1.48
Name von Prüfer und Prüfinstitution
Konformitätsdeklarationen
Konformität
Konformitätsystemname
Genehmigung der insgesamten Einhaltung
Fully compliant
Nomenclature compliance
Fully compliant
Methodological compliance
Fully compliant
Bewertung der Einhaltung
Fully compliant
Dokumentation der Einhaltung
Fully compliant
Einhaltung der Qualitätsvorgaben
Fully compliant
Konformität
Konformitätsystemname
Genehmigung der insgesamten Einhaltung
Fully compliant
Nomenclature compliance
Fully compliant
Methodological compliance
Fully compliant
Bewertung der Einhaltung
Fully compliant
Dokumentation der Einhaltung
Fully compliant
Einhaltung der Qualitätsvorgaben
Fully compliant
Konformität
Konformitätsystemname
Genehmigung der insgesamten Einhaltung
Not defined
Nomenclature compliance
Not defined
Methodological compliance
Not defined
Bewertung der Einhaltung
Not defined
Dokumentation der Einhaltung
Not defined
Einhaltung der Qualitätsvorgaben
Not defined
Auftraggeber und Ziel
Auftraggeber
Projekt Provision of "feed" process-based product environmental footprint-compliant life cycle inventory datasets. Contract number ENV.A.1/SER/2016/0035VL
Vorgesehene Anwendungen Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) datasets to be used in Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCRs) and Organisation Environmental Footprint Sectoral Rules (OEFSRs) developed in the context of the Environmental Footprint pilot phase launched by the Commission in 2013.
Datengenerator
Ersteller/Modellierer
Dateneingabe
Zeitstempel (zuletzt gespeichert) 2017-10-24T19:47:33+01:00
Datensatzformat(e)
Dateneingabe
Offizielle Genehmigung des Datensatzes durch Hersteller/Betreiber
Veröffentlichung und Eigentum
UUID 8c6389df-e12b-478f-bf7b-d7d1ec45707e
Datum der letzten Überarbeitung 2017-10-24T19:47:33+01:00
Datensatzversion 01.04.004
Arbeitsablauf und Publikationsstatus Data set finalised; entirely published
Eigentümer des Datensatzes
Copyright Ja
Verweis auf Personen mit exklusivem Zugang
Lizenztyp Free of charge for some user types or use types
Zugriffs- und Nutzungseinschränkungen Access through the dedicated LCDN node, for use in PEF-compliant studies related to the 24 pilots from the PEF/OEF pilot phase. End user license agreement: external_docs\EULA-European-Commission-Feed-LCI.pdf
Der Zugriff auf den Datensatz ist auf die Metadaten beschränkt. Registrieren Sie sich, um vollen Zugriff auf den Datensatz zu erhalten.
Der Zugriff auf den Datensatz ist auf die Metadaten beschränkt. Registrieren Sie sich, um vollen Zugriff auf den Datensatz zu erhalten.