| Key Data Set Information | |
| Location | AU |
| Geographical representativeness description | The dataset represents the cultivation of barley grain for Australia. Cultivation data from Australia is used to represent this region. The geographical representativeness (GeR) of parameters used for the process is considered. |
| Reference year | 2016 |
| Name |
Base name
; Treatment, standards, routes
; Mix and location types
Barley grain; ; technology mix; at farm
|
| Use advice for data set | It is intended for use in the feed PEFCR context and other PEF studies where applicable and compliant. |
| Technical purpose of product or process | Provision of a standard process according to the applied technology. |
| Classification |
Class name
:
Hierarchy level
|
| General comment on data set | - |
| Copyright | Yes |
| Owner of data set | |
| Quantitative reference | |
| Reference flow(s) |
|
| Time representativeness | |
| Data set valid until | 2020 |
| Time representativeness description | The DQR of the dataset reflects the quality of the data at reference year (2016). The most important time related parameter is the crop yield at agricultural cultivation (based on FAOStat, 2010-2014, for 5-years average data). Remaining parameters are based on country, crop and process specific data. |
| Technological representativeness | |
| Technology description including background system | This process describes the average production of barley grain on a farm in Australia. Cultivation process is based on the Agri-footprint methodology (2017). Considered activities include seeding and seed production, fertilizer and pesticide application rates and production, capital goods depreciation, energy use and transport for field management practices. The elementary flows include field emissions to the air and water, direct land use change, water use and emissions due to pesticide use.;Crop yields were derived mainly from 2010-2014 FAO statistics (FAOStat, FAO, 2016). Fertilizer application rates (in terms of N, P and K requirements) were derived from Pallière (2011), Rosas (2011) and FAOSTAT (2000). Specific fertilizer amounts are calculated based on crop specific nutrient requirements and country specific fertilizer mix derived from International Fertilizer Association (IFA) statistics (IFA, 2015).;Seeding rates are derived from 5-years average FOASTAT data or from the document “Technical Conversion Factors for Agricultural Commodities” document, FAOSTAT (2000). The production process of seeds is identical to this of crop cultivation with the only adjustment of the seed yield at seed production assumed to be 20% less that this of crop yield at farm.;Production of fertilizers and precursors have been modelled based on Kongshaug (1998) and Davis & Haglund (1999). The energy comes from Kongshaug (1998), while additional data on emissions was sourced from Davis and Haglund (1999). Other chemicals and auxiliary materials are modelled based on various data sources.;Animal manure is applied for soil maintenance based on the methodology described in appendix 4 of Vellinga et al. (2013). Heavy metals emissions due to manure and artificial fertilizer application have been calculated based on an adapted methodology from Nemecek & Schnetzer (2012). It is taking into account the heavy metal balance as a function of deposition, use of fertilizer and crop uptake using literature concerning heavy metal contents in manure (Amlinger et. al., 2004) and in fertilizers (Mels, Bisschops, & Swart, 2008).;Energy use was calculated based on data obtained from the farm simulation tool MEBOT (Schreuder, Dijk, Asperen, Boer, & Schoot, 2008).;With reference to the capital goods modelling, based on a literature review of Dutch farming practises we determined that the average material use from depreciation of machinery for arable farming equals 0.37 kg per litre diesel used at a farm. Average mass use of depreciation of machinery was determined using the mass of machinery (Williams, Audsley, & Sandars, 2006), repair factors for various machinery (Frischknecht et al., 2007), economic lifetime and utilisation rates of machinery (Wageningen UR, 2015a). The integration of capital good is analytically explain in the methodology report of the EC feed database (2017).;The pesticide production includes the active ingredient manufacturing (material and energy inputs) based on Green (1987), the inert ingredient production which comprises chemicals available by the ELCD database, the pesticide production which includes the mixing, blending and/or diluting the active ingredients with the inert ingredients and finally the packaging of marketable pesticide product. The integration of pesticide production is analytically explain in the methodology report of the EC feed database (2017). Pesticide application rates were taken from a large volume of literature sources.;Water use has been based on the "blue water" footprint (Mekonnen & Hoekstra, 2010). Land use change has been calculated using "Direct Land Use Change Assessment Tool (2015)" (Blonk Consultants, 2015).;The electricity, fuel production and transport data come from the EC dataset for energy and transport (“GaBi Energy&Transport LCI Datasets for EU Environmental Footprinting (EF) implementation 2016-2020”, of thinkstep AG).;[Dry Matter: 840 g/kg; Moisture: 160 g/kg; Gross Energy: 16.1 MJ/kg; Biogenic carbon of barley grain is 380.08 g/kg.] |
| Flow diagram(s) or picture(s) | |
| LCI method and allocation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Type of data set | LCI result | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LCI Method Principle | Attributional | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deviation from LCI method principle / explanations | None | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LCI method approaches |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deviations from LCI method approaches / explanations | None | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Modelling constants | Direct land use change (LUC): GHG emissions from direct LUC allocated to good/service for 20 years after the LUC occurs. For land use change, all carbon emissions and uptakes are inventoried separately as carbon dioxide from land transformation based on the "Direct Land Use Change Assessment Tool (2015)" (Blonk Consultants, 2015). Land transformation (m2) is also inventoried based on the available FAO statistics up to 2013.;Carbon storage and delayed emissions: credits associated with temporary (carbon) storage or delayed emissions are not considered in the calculation of the EF for the default impact categories.;Emissions off-setting: is not included.;Fossil and biogenic carbon emissions and removals: removals and emissions are modelled as follows:;All GHG emissions from fossil fuels are modelled consistently with the ILCD list of elementary flows. In the case that the emissions refer to the molecules CO2 and CH4, they are modelled as carbon dioxide (fossil) and methane (fossil).;Carbon storage in crops for feed, animals and milk are not included because this carbon is part of the short term carbon cycle and because of this, the carbon dioxide emissions at the end of the life cycle are also not modelled except when the stored carbon is released as methane due to enteric fermentation or manure management and storage, which is inventoried as ‘methane, biogenic’.;Biogenic carbon content of all products is reported in the metadata. This information has been collected based on CVB list (Centraal Veevoeder Bureau, 2011) which lists the chemical composition and nutritional values of feed and within which the carbon content has been calculated based on the Feedprint formula (Vellinga et al., 2013).;Soil carbon accumulation (uptake) via improved agricultural management is excluded from the model.;; | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deviation from modelling constants / explanations | None | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LCA methodology report | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Data sources, treatment and representativeness | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Data cut-off and completeness principles | Capital goods (for cultivation and transport) as well as their end-of-life are included.;For the cultivation and processing of crops the following activities are excluded:;-Other consumables (than chemical and organic fertilizer, pesticides, seeds, lime and fertilizer and pesticide packaging) used during cultivation;-Activities related to living at the farm;-Activities related to other business (e.g. producing wind energy);-Raw materials estimated to insignificantly contributing to the environmental impact;-Consumables used at the plant not used as a raw material or auxiliary material;-Packaging if occurring at the processing phase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deviation from data cut-off and completeness principles / explanations | None | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Data selection and combination principles | All relevant background data such as energy and auxiliary material are taken from the EF energy and transport dataset and Agri-footprint 3.0 and ELCD databases. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deviation from data selection and combination principles / explanations | None | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Data treatment and extrapolations principles | Several data sources have been combined. Country specific data have been modelled based on best available data sources. For regional data market shares have been formulated based on 5-years average production data and coverage has been extrapolated to 100% based on the countries with highest shares. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deviation from data treatment and extrapolations principles / explanations | None | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Documentation of data quality management | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Data source(s) used for this data set | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage supply or production covered | 100 % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Uncertainty adjustments | None | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Completeness | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Completeness of product model | All relevant flows quantified | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Supported impact assessment methods |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Completeness elementary flows, per topic |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Validation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Compliance Declarations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Compliance |
Compliance system name
|
Approval of overall compliance
Fully compliant |
Nomenclature compliance
Fully compliant |
Methodological compliance
Fully compliant |
Review compliance
Fully compliant |
Documentation compliance
Fully compliant |
Quality compliance
Fully compliant |
| Compliance |
Compliance system name
|
Approval of overall compliance
Fully compliant |
Nomenclature compliance
Fully compliant |
Methodological compliance
Fully compliant |
Review compliance
Fully compliant |
Documentation compliance
Fully compliant |
Quality compliance
Fully compliant |
| Compliance |
Compliance system name
|
Approval of overall compliance
Not defined |
Nomenclature compliance
Not defined |
Methodological compliance
Not defined |
Review compliance
Not defined |
Documentation compliance
Not defined |
Quality compliance
Not defined |
| Commissioner and goal | |
| Commissioner of data set | |
| Project | Provision of "feed" process-based product environmental footprint-compliant life cycle inventory datasets. Contract number ENV.A.1/SER/2016/0035VL |
| Intended applications | Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) datasets to be used in Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCRs) and Organisation Environmental Footprint Sectoral Rules (OEFSRs) developed in the context of the Environmental Footprint pilot phase launched by the Commission in 2013. |
| Data generator | |
| Data set generator / modeller | |
| Data entry by | |
| Time stamp (last saved) | 2017-10-24T19:47:33+01:00 |
| Data set format(s) | |
| Data entry by | |
| Official approval of data set by producer/operator | |
| Publication and ownership | |
| UUID | 8c6389df-e12b-478f-bf7b-d7d1ec45707e |
| Date of last revision | 2017-10-24T19:47:33+01:00 |
| Data set version | 01.04.004 |
| Workflow and publication status | Data set finalised; entirely published |
| Owner of data set | |
| Copyright | Yes |
| Reference to entities with exclusive access | |
| License type | Free of charge for some user types or use types |
| Access and use restrictions | Access through the dedicated LCDN node, for use in PEF-compliant studies related to the 24 pilots from the PEF/OEF pilot phase. End user license agreement: external_docs\EULA-European-Commission-Feed-LCI.pdf |